Closed leeyap closed 2 years ago
@leeyap I am sitting here with @kdorheim and here are some ideas:
diff
of each time series)We might have some other suggestions too, but these are both simple to do and don't require you re-running anything model-wise. Could you try these two alternative filters?
Just looking at the Mauna Loa record, that let more runs through, but now (as one might expect) future temperature is really high. These runs are still falling within the bounds of the CMIP max, but are much higher than they were before.
Thanks for the quick look. Huh. This surprises me given @kdorheim 's v3 analysis results; Kalyn, thoughts?
as one might expect
Why? 😕 Sorry if I'm being dense.
Oh sorry, I just meant that since we cranked up the CO2, it makes sense to me that temperature is higher now!
It sounds like you and @kdorheim got a chance to talk about next steps?
@bpbond Yep, still trying out a few things.
In line with the "calibrated-Hector" parameters (below), I updated my model parameters to attempt and raise Hector CO2 to match historical output.
My changed parameters:
I tried varying one at a time, and implementing all three. Despite best efforts, only one run made it through the filtering step on all four attempts...
Here is the most recent graph, with all three new parameter values implemented. Note that the CO2 output from 1950 on was slightly higher with the original AERO_SCALE and Q10, but 1850-1950 will not budge.
Not sure what the next steps here are. @bpbond: Help would be appreciated - thanks!