Closed mikapfl closed 1 year ago
That's sort of on purpose. These categories are only included in the no-rounding files that are only targeted at expert users. But probably it's best to include them but in an individual table to make sure people are not looking for them in the standard version. The idea with the relationship trees is good
I've added an additional table with the extra categories and the tree descriptions of the categories to the data description. The changes will be included in the data description of v2.5
The following categories which are used in PRIMAP-hist 2.4.2 are missing in the README (on zenodo in the description and in the pdf):
0
3
M.LULUCF
I think it would be good to describe all three. Only
3
is a standard IPCC2006 category, the other two are non-standard and deserve a proper definition. We can take the definition of0
from climate_categories ("National Total"), I think, but the description ofM.LULUCF
is not optimal there, we should probably find something a bit less circular.Maybe we could also show the relationships of the used categories in a tree like the ones generated by climate_categories? Something like this:
It would probably help to understand the relationships (especially for people who aren't used to IPCC 1996 categories).