Thanks for your kind words. So, the paper talks about UniverseG being pretrained on the OCTA500 dataset. But when I tried it on my own OCTA dataset, things didn't quite match up. And here's the kicker - when I cranked up the image batch-size to 50, the results were way worse than when it was less than 5. Any idea why that might be happening?
Thanks for your kind words. So, the paper talks about UniverseG being pretrained on the OCTA500 dataset. But when I tried it on my own OCTA dataset, things didn't quite match up. And here's the kicker - when I cranked up the image batch-size to 50, the results were way worse than when it was less than 5. Any idea why that might be happening?