Open tkurtovic98 opened 7 months ago
Hi, could it be a mismatch in dimension? Nevertheless, I think the difference is in the image reading when you are compiling the dataset. We were reading the dataset as a color dataset.
Hope this helps.
Hi, I set the IMG_SHAPE = (48, 48, 3) in the script before running it.
Also, when I generate the h5 file I store the pixels from each row to either the training, val or test dataset. So I guess there is possibly a mismatch here.
Would you mind providing your fer2013 h5 file or script used to generate the file?
Thanks.
Hi, I believe we are not allowed to share the dataset, even if it is compiled. We will consider on the script for compiling the datasets.
Hi, a script would also be great!
Thanks.
Hey there again, are there maybe any updates regarding the dataset compilation script?
Thanks.
Hey there again, are there maybe any updates regarding the dataset compilation script?
Thanks.
Hi, the data compile code is uploaded.
Hi there, first of all, great work with your research.
I have a question regarding the input dataset you used to train the model.
I tried loading the fer2013.h5 file that I have after preprocessing the original fer2013.csv file like so:
But when I looked at the tensorboard logs I found that the validation accuracy was around 70% after running the notebook you provided.
Is there something I am missing or is my h5 file different that what you used?
Thanks.