JMMP-Group / GO_coordination

Repository to coordinate the joint development of GOSI configurations
6 stars 0 forks source link

GOSI11: Vertical mixing, OSMOSIS #7

Open oceanaguiar opened 7 months ago

oceanaguiar commented 7 months ago
ukmo-cguiavarch commented 5 months ago

eORCA1 GOSI10p0 with OSMOSIS: eORCA1 configuration based on GOSI9 branch at 4.2.1 https://forge.nemo-ocean.eu/devs/ukmo/gosi/gosi/-/tree/2aa791c7a0ca1a361e5660aca4bd9f2c7e56b8b8 and the OSMOSIS branch at 4.2.1 https://forge.nemo-ocean.eu/nemo/nemo/-/tree/281-update-osmosis-branch. Note that this configuration is based on NEMO 4.2.1 but includes the implicit sea ice drag bug fix introduced at 4.2.2

30y integrations from GOSI9 1 year restart (GOSI9 froced by CORE, initialised from EN4).

Validation notes for the last decade of the integrations (y20-30):

OSMOSIS vs. TKE (u-dc107 vs. u-db902): https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-dc107_nemo_vs_u-db902_nemo/assess.html

OSMOSIS with waves vs. TKE (u-dc244 vs. u-db902): https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-dc244_nemo_vs_u-db902_nemo/assess.html

OSMOSIS with waves vs OSMOSIS (u-dc244 vs. u-dc107): https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-dc244_nemo_vs_u-dc107_nemo/assess.html

ERA5 vs. COREII (u-db902 vs. u-db619 ): https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-db902_nemo_vs_u-db619_nemo/assess.html

ukmo-cguiavarch commented 4 months ago

eORCA025 GOSI10p0 with OSMOSIS: eORCA025 configuration based on GOSI9 branch at 4.2.1 https://forge.nemo-ocean.eu/devs/ukmo/gosi/gosi/-/tree/2aa791c7a0ca1a361e5660aca4bd9f2c7e56b8b8 and the OSMOSIS branch at 4.2.1 https://forge.nemo-ocean.eu/nemo/nemo/-/tree/281-update-osmosis-branch. Note that this configuration is based on NEMO 4.2.1 but includes the implicit sea ice drag bug fix introduced at 4.2.2.

The OSMOSIS eORCA025 integration was unstable (Hollingsworth instability near the coast of Borneo), to be able to run with OSMOSIS we change the momentum advection from vector form to flux form (UBS).

_Note:The impact of the UBS scheme has been assessed with the TKE scheme but further investigation will be needed if we want to use UBS as standard (also not that UBS is removed at NEMO5)_

30y integrations from GOSI9 1 year restart (GOSI9 froced by CORE, initialised from EN4).

Validation notes for the last decade of the integrations (y20-30):

OSMOSIS vs. TKE (u-dc811 vs. u-dc819): https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-dc811_nemo_vs_u-dc819_nemo/assess.html

TKE UBS vs. TKE VEC (u-dc819 vs. u-dc743): https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-dc819_nemo_vs_u-dc743_nemo/assess.html

ukmo-cguiavarch commented 3 months ago

I have rerun the last 10y of eORCA025 OSMOSIS and TKE (u-dc811 and udc819) with the extra diagnostics. All available from MASS.

ukmo-cguiavarch commented 3 months ago

Impact of Fox-Kemper / OMOSIS interaction:

Validation notes for the last 5y of the integrations (2000-2005): OSMOSIS with FK interaction vs. OSMOSIS: https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-dc811_nemo_vs_u-de992_nemo/assess.html

With FK interaction: shallowing of the MLD in winter, warming below the subsurface at high latitude. Impact on SST localised in the Labrador Sea in winter/spring.

Update: I have now added the validation for the last 10 years of integration (1995-2005:) OSMOSIS with FK interaction vs. OSMOSIS: https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-dc811_nemo_vs_u-de992_nemo_10y/assess.html

ukmo-cguiavarch commented 2 months ago

Extending OSMOSIS and TKE runs

1995-2000: https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-dc811_nemo_vs_u-dc819_nemo_1995-2000/assess.html 2000:2005: https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-dc811_nemo_vs_u-dc819_nemo_2000-2005/assess.html 2005-2010: https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-dc811_nemo_vs_u-dc819_nemo_2005-2010/assess.html 2010:2015: https://gws-access.jasmin.ac.uk/public/jmmp/valid_ocean/u-dc811_nemo_vs_u-dc819_nemo_2010-2015/assess.html