Closed zhizhongpu closed 3 months ago
@zhizhongpu can you let me know our status here?
It's possible I may be able to ask someone else to jump in to help.
Thanks.
@zhizhongpu can you let me know our status here?
It's possible I may be able to ask someone else to jump in to help.
Thanks.
thanks @jmshapir - I've not started on this yet
@zhizhongpu thanks!
I'm coassigning @ew487. For now we can plan that whoever gets to this first (@zhizhongpu or @ew487) can work on it.
I will be in touch separately about how best to prioritize this with other work.
@ew487 please see https://github.com/JMSLab/Template/pull/99#issuecomment-2108415188 for where we left off here.
@jmshapir Problem seems to be that GitHub actions' macos-latest
module is now arm-based (no more x86).
I tested 3 solutions proposed on the Internet:
macos-latest
to macos-13
i.e. bc8f78bd0d481655495eca964dee8c359d5aadde and 63af2a371b49004146cdc3d7e09f899b0d79bd58@jmshapir lmk your thoughts. I'm not sure what the goal of these checks are, but if you have questions on the specific implications of (1) or (2) I'm happy to dig deeper.
fyi @ew487
https://github.com/actions/setup-python/issues/825 https://www.reddit.com/r/github/comments/1cjiat4/is_github_actions_macoslatest_now_only_armbased/
@zhizhongpu thanks!
I'm not sure what the goal of these checks are,
The goal is to increase our confidence that the builders work on a variety of systems.
@jmshapir lmk your thoughts.
Let's go with (2). Let me know when it's implemented in the main issue branch here, thanks!
0b933586f0a15f427f453b7cb8c57ff6da38a157 implements (2) and passed all checks. @jmshapir lmk if I can merge - thanks.
@zhizhongpu clear to merge thanks!
@zhizhongpu thanks!
I made a few tweaks in 4c9e1e8. Let me know if any concerns.
Otherwise, it looks like we have some failures in macos build testing. (At least one ubuntu test has passed though.) I think it's very unlikely to be related to the change we made here, so I wonder if we need to update our syntax for github actions.
Can you look into it?