JRCSTU / CO2MPAS-TA

EU's Type-Approving vehicle simulator predicting NEDC CO2 emissions from WLTP
https://co2mpas.readthedocs.io/
European Union Public License 1.1
23 stars 13 forks source link

END USER: Hash identifier #22

Open Loic-MJ opened 6 years ago

Loic-MJ commented 6 years ago

Hello, Point 3 in Appendix to the Addendum to the Type Approval Certificate, request "Hash identifier code of the correlation tool output report". How can we find this information in the correlation output and dice report? Does "hexnum" represent the hash of the file? Is it required always when the correlation tool is run or only when physical test is needed? Thanks for your help

VictorValverde commented 6 years ago

Dear @Loic-MJ , Currently, the correlation regulation mentions 2 hashes:

Whenever the DICE is used, independently from the dice decision it is important to keep in the Type Approval documentation folder the following elements:

Kind regards.

MaikeruJon commented 6 years ago

Loic-MH said "Point 3 in Appendix to the Addendum to the Type Approval Certificate, request "Hash identifier code of the correlation tool output report"." Where? I can't see it in the type approval certificate in appendix 4 of annex 1 of 2017/1151. Has 2017/1151 been amended? The link in VictorValverde's informative reply is to 2017/1152 which doesn't have a copy of the certificate, but does contain the same two references to the hash code as are also in 2017/1231

pavlovicj commented 6 years ago

Dear @MaikeruJon, you are right that Appendix to the Addendum to the Type Approval Certificate does not foresee input of any hash identifier code generated by the CO2MPAS. Point 3 of that Appendix is related to the deviation factor. What @VictorValverde explained in previous reply is the so-called "correlation regulation" or 2017/1152 where hash code is mentioned and he explained what shall be stored in TA documentation in order to be able to track the whole correlation process (input files, output report, dice report). Best Regards

ankostis commented 6 years ago

@Loic-MJ, @MaikeruJon and ALL users of v1.7.x:

The finalization procedure has changed in v1.7.x version according to the feedback in this issue. It is roughly mentioned in the release notes of v1.7.x

hash2regulation