Closed nickserv closed 10 years ago
I thought the convention was all lowercase?
Whoops sorry, I don't mean for the gem name itself. I mean the project name. So if we used this new spelling, the gem would be letteropend, and the class/module for the gem would be Letteropend. And I guess the title of the readme could be either.
The main reason I brought this up is because the convention for gems is for projects with capitals in the middle to have underscores in the gem name. I'm assuming you'd want the gem name letteropend and not letter_opend. If you called the module LetterOpend, the gem naming conventions would recommend to call the gem letter_opend. Also, as I mentioned earlier, I like the idea of keeping only one capital in the name as Letterboxd does.
Easily fixed! Consider it done...
Actually, I meant to suggest that the repository and gem name would be "letteropend", and the name in the readme would be "Letteropend". The ruby module would also be called "Letteropend".
I think we should change the capitalization in the readme to Letteropend.
Reasons