added check gha action #32

[awasyn]

Description

The commit adds rworkflows which is a suite of tools to make it easy for R developers to implement reproducible best practices on GitHub. Check: https://github.com/neurogenomics/rworkflows Issue: https://github.com/JRaviLab/MolEvolvR/issues/32

What kind of change(s) are included?

• [x] Feature (adds or updates new capabilities)
• [x] Enhancement (adds functionality).

Checklist

Please ensure that all boxes are checked before indicating that this pull request is ready for review.

• [x] I have read and followed the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines.
• [x] I have searched for existing content to ensure this is not a duplicate.
• [x] I have performed a self-review of these additions (including spelling, grammar, and related).
• [x] I have added comments to my code to help provide understanding.
• [x] I have added a test which covers the code changes found within this PR.
• [x] I have deleted all non-relevant text in this pull request template.
• [x] Reviewer assignment: Tag a relevant team member to review and approve the changes.

[awasyn]

@jananiravi Can you review my PR?

[awasyn]

I’ve noted one change we should address in the interim. I’m not opposed to having this workflow manage building the pkgdown website, but at the moment, this check duplicates some functionality. I’d like your perspective on keeping the existing pkgdown action versus implementing the one in this PR.

I agree. The pkgdown in rworkflow can be on hold as It won't actually deploy since the checks are bound to fail as a result of incomplete function documentation.

Having the current pkgdown workflow is probably the best option to keep the site updated as changes are added.