Currently match is a bit verbose, as writing match <expression> with ... is a bit cumbersome.
In particular the with keyword, which is used nowhere else and serves no real purpose here.
High-level description of the feature
It might be better to do it like this: <expression> match ..., with ... being the match arms.
This is similar to how Scala does it and to my eye a more elegant way to write match expressions.
Description of potential implementation
Remove with keyword, and make match a postfix function.
Current Issue
Currently
matchis a bit verbose, as writingmatch <expression> with ...is a bit cumbersome. In particular thewithkeyword, which is used nowhere else and serves no real purpose here.High-level description of the feature
It might be better to do it like this:
<expression> match ..., with...being the match arms. This is similar to how Scala does it and to my eye a more elegant way to write match expressions.Description of potential implementation
Remove
withkeyword, and makematcha postfix function.