"Historically large thefts of bitcoin,even when unrelated to security flawsin the bitcoin network itself,have resulted in signifiant decreases to the bitcoin price.
This would allow an attacker to profitin at least two ways.First, he would gain the bitcoin storedin the insecure layer two network, and second, he could "short" bitcoinand thereby profit from the decreased market value of bitcoin."
all of this is needed to be replaced by
"Historically large thefts of Bitcoin, even when unrelated to security flaws in the Bitcoin network itself, have resulted in significant decreases to the Bitcoin price.
This would allow an attacker to profiting at least two ways. First, he would gain the Bitcoin stored in the insecure layer two network, and second, he could "short" Bitcoin and thereby profit from the decreased market value of Bitcoin."
"Historically large thefts of bitcoin,even when unrelated to security flawsin the bitcoin network itself,have resulted in signifiant decreases to the bitcoin price.
This would allow an attacker to profitin at least two ways.First, he would gain the bitcoin storedin the insecure layer two network, and second, he could "short" bitcoinand thereby profit from the decreased market value of bitcoin."
all of this is needed to be replaced by
"Historically large thefts of Bitcoin, even when unrelated to security flaws in the Bitcoin network itself, have resulted in significant decreases to the Bitcoin price.
This would allow an attacker to profiting at least two ways. First, he would gain the Bitcoin stored in the insecure layer two network, and second, he could "short" Bitcoin and thereby profit from the decreased market value of Bitcoin."