search

JabRef / JabRef-Word-Addin

MIT License
23 stars 7 forks source link

chore(deps): bump formik from 2.2.9 to 2.4.1 #634

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 1 year ago

dependabot[bot] commented 1 year ago

Bumps formik from 2.2.9 to 2.4.1.

Release notes

Sourced from formik's releases.

formik@2.4.1

Patch Changes

  • 2b194c2 #3808 Thanks @​NagaiKoki! - fix type of setFieldValue function

  • 708bcb2 #3813 Thanks @​probablyup! - Revert FieldArray "shouldComponentUpdate" performance optimization. As it turns out, it's a common use case to have JSX controlled via non-Formik state/props inside of FieldArray, so it's not safe to cancel re-renders here.

  • 187e47d #3815 Thanks @​probablyup! - Revert Yup transform support for the time being, this may be re-introduced in a future release under an opt-in prop.

formik@2.4.0

Minor Changes

formik@2.3.3

Patch Changes

  • f075a0c #3798 Thanks @​probablyup! - Fixed the use of generics for the ArrayHelpers type such that any[] is the default array type and for each individual method the array item type can be overridden if necessary.

formik@2.3.2

Patch Changes

  • f086b5a #3237 Thanks @​pieplu! - Changed getIn to return undefined when it can't find a value AND a parent of that value is "falsy" ( "" / 0 / null / false )

  • 6d8f018 #3792 Thanks @​probablyup! - Update the type for setFieldValue to reflect the returned Promise and potential returned error(s).

formik@2.3.0

Minor Changes

  • 73de78d #3788 Thanks @​probablyup! - Added typescript generics to ArrayHelpers interface and its methods so that users who use TypeScript can set the type for their arrays and have type safety on array utils. I have also gone ahead and made supplying a type for the generic optional for the sake of backwards compatibility so any existing TS code that does not give a type for the FieldArray will continue to work as they always have.

  • 39a7bf7 #3786 Thanks @​probablyup! - Yup by default only allows for cross-field validation within the same field object. This is not that useful in most scenarios because a sufficiently-complex form will have several yup.object() in the schema.

    const deepNestedSchema = Yup.object({
  object: Yup.object({
    nestedField: Yup.number().required(),
  }),
  object2: Yup.object({
    // this doesn't work because `object.nestedField` is outside of `object2`
    nestedFieldWithRef: Yup.number()
      .min(0)
      .max(Yup.ref('object.nestedField')),

... (truncated)

Commits


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
dependabot[bot] commented 1 year ago

Superseded by #651.