Add comparison with other bibliographic managers

[tobiasdiez]

We should add a new page comparing JabRef to other popular reference managers to make it easier for users to decide (and see advantages/disadvantages). Should cover Mendeley + Zotero (the most popular ones), BibDesk (direct competitor)

Examples:

• https://researchtips.ugent.be/en/tips/00001796/
• https://www.zotero.org/why
• https://canny.io/compare/uservoice
• https://www.upvoty.com/compare/
• https://discourse.jabref.org/t/why-zotero-and-jabref-are-two-different-apps/
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013132/#!po=2.17391

[Siedlerchr]

See also :https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/wiki/JabRef-in-the-Media

[koppor]

See also https://ultimate-comparisons.github.io/ultimate-reference-management-software-comparison/

[koppor]

The TUM comparison is also popular: https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1316333/1316333.pdf

[koppor]

Workflow used by other: https://veronikach.com/habits-productivity/manage-bibliography-evernote-jabref/

[tobiasdiez]

From Frédéric Darboux: https://ist.inrae.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2020/09/R%C3%A9sum%C3%A9-Choisir_logiciel_bibliographique_2020-09.pdf

[tobiasdiez]

Good overview: https://aut.ac.nz.libguides.com/managingreferences