Closed wujastyk closed 2 years ago
JabRef 5.4--2021-11-25--7ec4c7e Windows 10 10.0 amd64 Java 16.0.2 JavaFX 17.0.1+1
I can second this. I have seen this a lot and it extends to the number
field as well.
Here is the one from Modern Language Association 9th version:
@Article{Abdullah202005NNN,
author = {Walid Jumblatt Abdullah},
date = {2020-05},
journaltitle = {Democratization},
title = {New Normal No More: Democratic Backsliding in Singapore After 2015},
doi = {10.1080/13510347.2020.1764940},
number = {7},
pages = {1123--1141},
volume = {27},
file = {:Abdullah (2020) New normal no more. Democratic backsliding in Singapore after 2015.pdf:PDF},
publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
}
The same shows up also under options>preferences>entry preview
. Not all citationstyles do have this duplication, but many do. For some it is the journal
field, for some it only is the number
field.
Question: Do you have bibtex or biblatex mode in your library? Does it make a difference?
Normally biblatex. Tried changing to bibtex, both in main Preferences and in Library. No change.
Dito. I also tried to convert some entries from biblatex to bibtex style via cleanup entries
to see if there was a change in the preview, but there was no change.
The CSL Styles are here, they are updated automatically from the remote repo, maybe something from the last update went wrong? https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/tree/main/buildres/csl
I just tested an entry with Zotero and there it works fine. See:
Thompson, Mark R. ‘Middle-Class Remorse: Re-Embracing Liberal Democracy in the Philippines and Thailand’. Global Asia, vol. 15, no. 1, East Asia Foundation, Mar. 2020, pp. 60–64.
In Jabref we have the dublicate. See:
I checked with Winmerge if the citation-style code is any different between the ones used by Zotero (https://www.zotero.org/styles/modern-language-association) and the one from Jabref (Options>preferences>entry preview>Modern Language Association 9th edition
) and there was no difference.
Looks like it is more of an implementation problem.
Follow up: There is ONE difference when i copy the code from Jabref (Options>preferences>entry preview>Modern Language Association 9th edition>edit
) into the editor (= the text editor on Windows 10) and save it as a textfile: According to Winmerge, both used different line-break format.
Re: link
The CSL Styles are here, they are updated automatically from the remote repo, maybe something from the last update went wrong?
This has been an issue for a very long time. Maybe a year? I've just been living with it, and only thought to report it now.
@ThiloteE Would you mind reporting the issue here with your investigation details? https://github.com/michel-kraemer/citeproc-java JabRef is using this library for the handling of the CSL styles.
"This issue is now fixed in citeproc-java v3.0.0-alpha.3" - michel-kraemer
@ThiloteE Thanks. Should be picked up by the Dependabot tomorrow with a couple of other updates.
Awesome :-)
Thank you, everyone!
JabRef version
Latest development branch build (please note build date below)
Operating system
GNU / Linux
Details on version and operating system
JabRef 5.4--2021-11-25--7aaf5e2 Linux 5.11.0-40-generic amd64 Java 16.0.2 JavaFX 17.0.1+1
Checked with the latest development build
Steps to reproduce the behaviour
Journal:
Book in series:
I have tried a dozen or so different preview styles. Above are "Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed" and "Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy", but it's the same whatever style I choose.
I wouldn't mind editing the preview template to my liking, but that's currently not available
Appendix