Support for webwormhole

[VarLad]

Checklist

• [X] I have searched the issue tracker for open issues that relate to the same feature, before opening a new one.
• [X] This issue only relates to a single feature. I will open new issues for any other features.

Is your feature request related to a problem?

While wormhole is nice for sending from one device to other on the local network, webwormhole is an alternative to send data across the internet using p2p.

Describe the solution you'd like to see.

It would be nice if rymdport could support webwormhole alongside wormhole as well. Its written in Go as well (repo link here: https://github.com/saljam/webwormhole ) and for the UI, it can be the same as what rymdport provides for magic wormhole. Which means:

1. Generate word code/QR code
2. Progress bar for sending/receiving

[Jacalz]

Thanks for opening this feature request. I have thought a bit about it and I am not quite sure if it is something that I want to implement.

Adding a new protocol to support seems like it would confuse people and convolute the code quite a bit. If anything, I'd prefer if webwormhole supported the magic-wormhole protocol instead of implementing a new one. The latter seems like more of a standard to me.

I'm sorry that this probably isn't what you want to hear. However, I do have plans to compile to web assembly and run Rymdport in the browser some time in the future. There is a lot of work needed to get that working though so it would probably happen a year or two in the future, if not later. It is not a short term solution unfortunately.