Closed Ahmad-Amsyar closed 4 months ago
Hello,
I've been meaning to upgrade the binaries for a while, but I need to do more testing.
The VarDCT behavior was changed in libjxl 0.9.*
compared to 0.8.*
. The images are slightly larger and the pixel output is different. I need to make sure those changes are positive.
JPG Reconstruction also needs to be tested thoroughly with every version change.
I've already tried upgrading and got burned, because djxl
had broken pathing on Windows (didn't accept drive letters).
The next version will still be using 0.8.1
. After that, I will try testing the newer builds (0.9.2
perhaps?).
It is a complex topic, but it's worth to mention we are on the bleeding-edge. Ensuring everything works is crucial.
That being said, I do appreciate your effort. I have read your email and seen your libjxl
pull request. I'm happy somebody cares about my software.
That is a really clear explanation and I understand the difficulty and issue you are facing, I wish you good luck. You really have amazing software and I will always keep using it.
Replacing the JPEG XL file from version 0.8.1 to version 0.10.0.
File source is from https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/releases/tag/v0.10.0
SHA-1 CHECKSUM:
brotlicommon.dll: 1A64952EC8FE86C15FE9C04BEC902FF3A3180429
brotlidec.dll: BC9FF9CC17844FF5B411D105FB65C2A28B8D7291
brotlienc.dll: 4E708E8368D155A1014E776FF56165387A9EDB94
cjxl.exe: 1A796C276F95A9752D0EE2811A55E82BCA9AF979
djxl.exe: 2C1EBDE6AE78962A3DF4BFD44EE0489076EF448D
jxl.dll: 14C2A2D62A0149CCA73BBE5F1521B92F38FD1811
jxl_threads.dll: 0A7ED67626FD8C81049A3E98CB604BD294483326
jxlinfo.exe: 5478872368A77D5CA9FAE078AF129ABB60EC80C8