Open samm82 opened 1 year ago
I can try to :smile:
I strongly agree with @JacquesCarette, I don't think that switching the types of those unitals should be done in the same PR. It's likely asking for too much in one PR since type-checking issues are likely to occur. Right now, the type-checking results are shown in the console logs (around the start of each case study's execution). With each variable type change, there's a chance that it results in a flurry of other type-checking issues, so it might take a while. I can definitely try to help out more with this.
https://github.com/JacquesCarette/Drasil/issues/2587 is a relevant issue to this too. It would be nice for us to re-evaluate how vectors are generally done in Drasil, and 'fix' them to work as intended and needed.
Vectors are certainly a hot topic in Drasil. I think we all want them to be more usable. I would like to get to working on them too, I'm just a bit lost with what work to prioritize right now. I'm going to try to orient myself a bit more this weekend, but hopefully I can find some time to work on them asap. Perhaps we can (all?) collaborate to fix it up?
As mentioned here by @JacquesCarette in #3237, many physics quantities in
drasil-data
should have a space ofVect Real
, not ofReal
(for example,positionVec
). However, "Drasil might not be ready for it, so it should be done incrementally."Perhaps you would want to comment on this @balacij?