We don't necessarily have the types we need to be able to represent discrete indices. We might not have the right "language of types" to let us describe such types either.
Does this mean that we should first define the correct "language of types" to describe these discrete indices types? Or evaluate a better solution after 3717 and 3716.
We don't necessarily have the types we need to be able to represent discrete indices. We might not have the right "language of types" to let us describe such types either.