Closed justindotpub closed 5 years ago
IANAL, but I'm pretty sure you'd have to get the other 11 contributors to explicitly agree to the licensing, or replace their contributions.
Good point. If we know what license we want to go with I’m willing to reach out to contributors to get their approval, assuming consent on a github issue is sufficient.
Hey, sorry for being unresponsive here. You're right, choosing a license is overdue. I don't have a strong opinion on it, and Apache 2.0 seems fine to me.
I do want to get opinions from contributors in case anyone has a stronger opinion. Pinging all contributors who have contributed more than a 1-liner:
@mattbaker @lukaszsamson @GoNZooo @percygrunwald
Any thoughts on MIT vs. Apache 2.0 vs. BSD license? If I don't hear any objections within a week or so, I'm going to take that as confirmation that Apache 2.0 is fine.
I don't have a strong or particularly educated opinion on this and these are all of the weak permissive kind, so I think they're probably all fine.
Apache 2.0 is fine with me, thanks!
Apache 2.0 looks good to me.
It's fine with me also
@JakeBecker I am making the assumption that you are okay with Apache 2.0 but it seemed like a reasonable choice given that Elixir itself uses this license. Thanks.
Closes #119.