Closed Raynos closed 9 years ago
Please give me your thoughts on 0.3.0 @Raynos. Shrinkpack now only manages the contents of node_shrinkwrap based on the contents of the npm-shrinkwrap.json - and no longer creates it for you.
It should now also be much faster, as it only removes redundant packages and adds new ones - with the others being left as they were.
Ideas or changes welcome, thanks.
I looked at this tool and the README and became pretty excited!
I ran
shrinkpack -h
and it immediately didrm -rf node_modules; rm npm-shrinkwrap.json; npm install
. I was surprised and a bit sad as I forgot togit add .
I would like to propose that this program does not run
.clean()
. Deleting all of these files is going to generate a lot of churn and also take a lot of time.Furthermore running
.rebuild()
is also not a good idea. The application developer should drive npm install and shrinkwrap itself. I have annpm-shrinkwrap
module ( https://github.com/uber/npm-shrinkwrap ) that I use as a better shrinkwrap and I want to use this module as well.I would like to propose that this program only does the
.save()
path.I'd be willing to open a pull request (with tests!!) to implement this if the feature is welcome.
I would also implement a
-h
and--help
output.