Came across your wonderful and very useful work. I am trying to recreate results you have published before customizing network further. I had few questions.
Does the architecture (Ni) found while running arch_adapt_ssd_lite.sh get printed in the .log file ?
And does one need to manually copy that architecture info from .log file to fna_ssdlite_retrain.py as _netconfig before running param_adapt_ssdlite.sh?
Btw, I got very different searched architecture (Ni) when I ran arch_adapt_ssdlite.sh. I am running on 2 GTX1080Ti. Could that play big role?
Is there a way to find out whether architecture search was successful or not before one embarks on training journey which takes relatively longer time.
We suggest running the code on 8 GPUs to keep the total batch size the same as ours, as the small batch size may lead to performance degradation.
Retraining the searched architecture might be the best way to validate the performance. You could also observe the searched architecture by the logged net_config.
Hope my answer could help you!
Came across your wonderful and very useful work. I am trying to recreate results you have published before customizing network further. I had few questions.
Does the architecture (Ni) found while running arch_adapt_ssd_lite.sh get printed in the .log file ? And does one need to manually copy that architecture info from .log file to fna_ssdlite_retrain.py as _netconfig before running param_adapt_ssdlite.sh?
Btw, I got very different searched architecture (Ni) when I ran arch_adapt_ssdlite.sh. I am running on 2 GTX1080Ti. Could that play big role? Is there a way to find out whether architecture search was successful or not before one embarks on training journey which takes relatively longer time.
Thanks for your help.