Closed VolkerH closed 1 year ago
Hi, yes, that issue should be fixed ... but I haven't tried 2D images yet ...
Thanks for the reply, that is great to hear.
Is the fix for the complexity issue with the number of tiles fixed only available this Spark-based version or is it (will it) also in the "normal" Big Stitcher Fiji plugin fusion code? Still hoping I can get around setting up Spark to try this out.
The normal BigStitcher code is now also scaling much better with the number of tiles ...
Hi @StephanPreibisch ,
thanks for this new project. Need to set up Spark first, but keen to give this a try. Saw the announcement on twitter but as I don't have a twitter account I'll ask a related question here:
We ran into issues running fusion with a large number of 2D tiles (not using the Spark version). The fusion step would just take many hours when fusing around 700 individual 2D tiles (mosaic scan of a whole slide). We observed that the scaling behaviour with the number of tiles was very unfortunate (polynomic), where I would expect it should only grow approximately linearly with the number of output pixels.
As I had the impression that Big Stiticher was primarily developed for Light-Sheet data (fewer but much larger volume tiles and not many 2D tiles) this scaling behaviour with the number of tiles might have gone unnoticed?
EDIT to add:
The above behaviour was noticed on the non-Spark version of affine fusion, any chance this has already been fixed with this code?