Open Buggytheclown opened 3 years ago
I deliberately decided against this when I wrote this library, since I wanted to keep it simple and to the core. Where any additional features/use cases would be implemented as custom higher order reducers (at least this was the plan). That said, I definitely see your point, its unfortunate that the limit is the third argument now, but I did not want to break backwards compatibility for "styling" reasons ... Since the object would also break backwards compatibility it would have to be done in a major release which is not planned atm since I simply don't have enough feature requests to warrant that ...
If i want to pass limit config i need to add "initAction" and "comparator" explicitly or as undefined
I want to be able to pass only needed args, for example