Open sixone-Jiang opened 1 year ago
[03/13 11:19:10 fewx.evaluation.coco_evaluation]: Evaluation results for Non VOC 60 categories =======> AP : 0.00 [03/13 11:19:10 fewx.evaluation.coco_evaluation]: Evaluation results for Non VOC 60 categories =======> AP50: 0.00 [03/13 11:19:10 fewx.evaluation.coco_evaluation]: Evaluation results for Non VOC 60 categories =======> AP75: 0.00 [03/13 11:19:10 fewx.evaluation.coco_evaluation]: Evaluation results for Non VOC 60 categories =======> APs : 0.00 [03/13 11:19:10 fewx.evaluation.coco_evaluation]: Evaluation results for Non VOC 60 categories =======> APm : 0.00 [03/13 11:19:10 fewx.evaluation.coco_evaluation]: Evaluation results for Non VOC 60 categories =======> APl : 0.00
How about the novel classes? The test only counts novel classes
In COCO, all novel classes get 0 AP, but in VOC, I can get similar AP like you. May be I split the datasets wrong?
Could be, you can check the steps in data generation phase
Also check the ID mapper is correct for the VOC classes in COCO
Thanks for your reply! At your reminder, I thought that non_voc60 should get 0AP in the testing stage; After the pre-training model you provided is fine-tuned, the category of nonVoc will not be recognized.
May I ask if this result is obtained after fine-tuning? I can't fine-tune the code once it's running
I get less than 3 AP in COCO, but I get the AP that similar to you in VOC; I check my output log find that many object in COCO get 0 AP; how can I fix it?