search

JarlPatrick / eoa

MIT License
1 stars 3 forks source link

Statistics pages sorting #23

Closed kaarelkivisalu closed 3 years ago

kaarelkivisalu commented 3 years ago

https://eoa.ee/?kool=true and https://eoa.ee/?hof=true are not sorted properly.

https://eoa.ee/?kool=true is not sorted at all.

https://eoa.ee/?hof=true seems to be sorted by "1. KOHTI" but secont sorting parameter is random.

marko213 commented 3 years ago

What would be good criteria for sorting these tables? First places, then second places, then third places? Total of the count of the first three places, then by the places individually?

kaarelkivisalu commented 3 years ago

I think overall participation might be the most relevant. For example, a student that has participated in 7 competitions but does not have any high places should be higher on the list than a person who has participated in one olympiad and achieved the third place there.

marko213 commented 3 years ago

In that case, should all people who have participated in at least one contest be shown in the hall of fame? Currently, only students with at least one placement 1st-3rd are shown (source).

JarlPatrick commented 3 years ago

I prefer sorting based on participation. But I think that we have to decide how many participations are required to get there. Some statistics (participation-how many students): 25-1 24-1 23-2 22-1 21-4 20-3 19-1 18-3 17-6 16-3 15-5 14-11 13-10 12-13 11-23 10-16 9-24 8-26 7-55 6-95 5-110 4-238 3-362 2-599 1-1729 So I think we should include everyone who has got TOP3 or at least 8 participations (This is open for discussion).

marko213 commented 3 years ago

Note that there are currently 450 people with at least one top 3 placement in the database (502 in total when also counting others with >= 8 participations). Should the hall of fame display be based on how many people would be shown (and the participation count be manually adjusted to match that)?