Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I am running The Unarchiver on Mac OS X 10.5.8 on a PowerPC machine.
Original comment by yuan...@gmail.com
on 16 Aug 2009 at 8:15
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 17 Aug 2009 at 12:52
This file seems to trigger several issues. To see if I've fixed one of the
easier ones, can you confirm if the file
"ABBYY FineReader 5 Sprint Plus/Content/for Mac OS X Add-on/TextLang.Dat" is 0
bytes in length when
extracted with StuffIt Expander? I do not have it installed at the moment.
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 17 Aug 2009 at 1:45
Here is an installer-free version of StuffIt:
http://www.mediafire.com/?jjmkmqonhcd
Just decompress and run.
BTW, TextLang.Dat is 0 bytes in length when extracted with StuffIt Expander.
Original comment by yuan...@gmail.com
on 17 Aug 2009 at 2:30
Excellent, then that file should be fixed. The others that fail seem to be
using some preprocessing filters that I
have not figured out yet. I'll see how difficult it would be to fix those.
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 17 Aug 2009 at 10:31
All right, the other files that fail are indeed using preprocessing filters
that are not yet implemented. There are
eight of these, and this file uses two of them. I'm going to bump this to a
future version, because reverse-
engineering them all would take more time than I have available right now.
What would help greatly with getting this done is more example files that use
the six other preprocessing
filters. Any file that fails to extract is probably using one (unless it using
the JPEG compression mode).
I've listed them with names on
http://code.google.com/p/theunarchiver/wiki/SitxSpecs, in case anybody
wants to try and figure out how to get StuffIt to produce files using those
filters. They seem to be related to
specific processors and file formats.
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 18 Aug 2009 at 12:29
Issue 317 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 7 Feb 2011 at 11:52
x86 preprocessor implemented.
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2011 at 11:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
yuan...@gmail.com
on 16 Aug 2009 at 8:14