Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently MTLLM is running as a separate repo but the with_llm feature in jaclang only works with mtllm installed. and there is no purpose for that if mttlm is not installed. At the same time developers has to make PRs to the jaclang repo to get language level changes that required to add new functionalities to the mtllm repo. This is counter-productive.
Describe the solution you'd like
Currently we can override add new methods to stuff in plugin folder using pluggy. What if we add the same ability to all the Passes in jaclang. How it will look in the plugin repo will look like this for mtllm
Another option is to have the mtllm inside jaclang. this is not productive as it defeats the purpose of giving developers the ability to create plugins.
Whats the use case for this, I'm thinking a pattern of having the body of the function make a call into the plugin interface might might make more sense.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently MTLLM is running as a separate repo but the with_llm feature in jaclang only works with mtllm installed. and there is no purpose for that if mttlm is not installed. At the same time developers has to make PRs to the jaclang repo to get language level changes that required to add new functionalities to the mtllm repo. This is counter-productive.
Describe the solution you'd like
Currently we can override add new methods to stuff in plugin folder using pluggy. What if we add the same ability to all the Passes in jaclang. How it will look in the plugin repo will look like this for mtllm
Describe alternatives you've considered
Another option is to have the mtllm inside jaclang. this is not productive as it defeats the purpose of giving developers the ability to create plugins.