JasmineCT / portfolio

The starter portfolio repository, basically empty, but with a few helper files.
https://hopeful-morse-7f7dbf.netlify.com/
0 stars 0 forks source link

Portfolio Design & Content Review #11

Open lees3 opened 4 years ago

lees3 commented 4 years ago

Really great and full website Jas!

Some possible edits to consider: On "Brand Design" card, instead of "Creating a fully rounded look and feel that is just for you" - maybe say something like "Creating a unified overall look and feel, suited just for you" On "Illustration" card, could remove the word "world" Packaging card: maybe make it different than the branding card (I know you might still be working on doing this) Link up the rest of the cards (I know you could be working on this as well) The rest looks awesome. Good job! Really like your "connect" section and the fun look and feel of the way you've laid out your pieces!

0 points 1 points 2 points 3 points
Pages & images Barely started Missing lots of pages & images Has most of the pages, some placeholder images All pages exist and are well done with complete imagery
Personality & design Bland, boring, just another graphic designer Fairly generic, visual design could be pushed more Quality layouts and unique, personable content & design Unique and recognizable as you, with engaging, personable content & design
Image quality Only placeholder images Some portfolio piece images Lots of images but low quality High quality portfolio images — and lots of them
Accessibility No considerations Added some alt attributes, nothing else Just the basics: alt attributes, roles Accessibility is well considered and tested
Text content Fake content only Some real content, some fake All real content but with lots of errors Real content, well written, no grammar or spelling errors
Responsiveness Not responsive Works on some screens Responsive but with lots of awkwardness Looks great on all screen sizes
Code quality Barely started Indentation is barely existent, lots of validation errors, very poor semantics Decent indentation, just a couple validation errors, decent semantics Well indented, fully valid, good semantics

18/21