EdwinKuttappi
commented
8 months ago A. 1 point for each FRQ. 1.1 or .9 basis for above or below the line per FRQ. Correct complete and running in Jupyter Notebook meets the basis. Ran all code cells and verified outputs Grading based on 0.9 basis
FRQ #1: 0.9/0.9 I saw all the code and it was running correctly, and it had all the correct outputs that needed to be there FRQ #2: 0.9/0.9 I saw the code here and it works and everything was running correctly as I saw all 5 instances of test data FRQ #3: 0.9/0.9 You had outputs for each one, but I think that part a was a little bit too modified, but it was nice that you were able to simplify it down completely FRQ #4: 0.9/0.9 In this FRQ, for part a you initialized a numList which wasn't necessary, but according to CollegeBoard's rubric you would get full points. For parts b and c, I think you did pretty good and had the correct outputs.
B. Please assist with FRQ association issue. Read or review a couple of my comments, including Vishnu comments to qualify you to grade. 4 or 3.6 is basis. 3.6/3.6 This was quite the impressive connection to PBL. I thought the same thing after reading FRQ 2, I was like hey this is just like that popular game wordle. So it was interesting how you decided to base a project around it, I mean the code is already done, all you need are some changes on spring, I also think a good addition, something that Vishnu did is add the topics you struggled with and make it a priority in order to ensure you understand these topics before the AP Exam
Notable Mentions
I really liked seeing how Haoxuan tackled this problem because it seemed really cool, and it was really nice and easy, and much more simpler than my code. I also liked that he implemented char, which I did not but should have. I also liked his comment about how it was just Wordle but with OOP. It's good he converted the strings to chars, I think this was a unique way to approach it.
I also liked how he was able to simplify the constructors given by CollegeBoard in FRQ #3, I think that it was really cool and that he was still able to produce an output.
Comments: Make sure to make each FRQ into its own separate Jupyter Notebook You could've attempted each FRQ without research, then researched after completion and attempted the problem again It was great that you added some honest comments in your summaries after each FRQ. I like how the code in the association blog was concise and I didn't seen any unnecessary code.
Haoxuan's FRQ's