Jason-Clark-FG / OpenMetadata-FG

Factors Group Customizations to the OpenMetadata repository
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

jjwt-0.9.1.jar: 1 vulnerabilities (highest severity is: 7.5) - autoclosed #82

Closed mend-for-github-com[bot] closed 7 months ago

mend-for-github-com[bot] commented 7 months ago
Vulnerable Library - jjwt-0.9.1.jar

Library home page: https://github.com/jwtk/jjwt

Path to dependency file: /openmetadata-service/pom.xml

Path to vulnerable library: /openmetadata-service/pom.xml

Vulnerabilities

CVE Severity CVSS Dependency Type Fixed in (jjwt version) Remediation Possible**
CVE-2024-31033 High 7.5 jjwt-0.9.1.jar Direct N/A

**In some cases, Remediation PR cannot be created automatically for a vulnerability despite the availability of remediation

Details

CVE-2024-31033 ### Vulnerable Library - jjwt-0.9.1.jar

Library home page: https://github.com/jwtk/jjwt

Path to dependency file: /openmetadata-service/pom.xml

Path to vulnerable library: /openmetadata-service/pom.xml

Dependency Hierarchy: - :x: **jjwt-0.9.1.jar** (Vulnerable Library)

Found in base branch: main

### Vulnerability Details

JJWT (aka Java JWT) through 0.12.5 ignores certain characters and thus a user might falsely conclude that they have a strong key. The impacted code is the setSigningKey() method within the DefaultJwtParser class and the signWith() method within the DefaultJwtBuilder class. NOTE: the vendor disputes this because the "ignores" behavior cannot occur (in any version) unless there is a user error in how JJWT is used, and because the version that was actually tested must have been more than six years out of date.

Publish Date: 2024-04-01

URL: CVE-2024-31033

### CVSS 3 Score Details (7.5)

Base Score Metrics: - Exploitability Metrics: - Attack Vector: Network - Attack Complexity: Low - Privileges Required: None - User Interaction: None - Scope: Unchanged - Impact Metrics: - Confidentiality Impact: High - Integrity Impact: None - Availability Impact: None

For more information on CVSS3 Scores, click here.

mend-for-github-com[bot] commented 7 months ago

:heavy_check_mark: This issue was automatically closed by Mend because the vulnerable library in the specific branch(es) was either marked as ignored or it is no longer part of the Mend inventory.