Open JasonRay168 opened 8 months ago
We agree - this is a feature we forgot to remove from UG
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Low
]
Reason for disagreement: I am sorry, but I beg to differ. I still believe that this is not a cosmetic issue. This is a form of a bug in the correctness of your DG as it displays a feature with no explanations.
I argue that this will hinder the reader as readers/users will think that they are missing an implementation detail and has no way of knowing about it.
However, since it does not affect the other details in the DG PDF, it does not affect the readability of the PDF as a whole.
And since only cosmetic issues can have very low severity, I believe this is still a low severity issue.
Under feature implementations, there is one section that seems to be out of place:
This is clearly not under your list of features, and furthermore no implementation details have been made.