Closed stefandascalu64 closed 4 years ago
Lamar is very purposely not signed and will not likely be in the future.
Have you tried StrongNamer as a workaround?
yes, but after some issues we ended up giving up on the whole mess. Can you tell me the reason why it is "very purposely not signed"
Strong naming causes a whole lot of pain downstream, especially for libs like Lamar that will be diamond dependencies. This isn't a new discussion by any stretch of the imagination.
I am using Lamar in a project that has a strong name key and the fact that this binary is not signed is causing some problems when I try to publish. Are there any plans to add this in the future so I can use nuget.org binaries instead of my current annoying workaround?