Open Jaspertzx opened 2 months ago
Dear tester,
We want to thank you for your feedback.
At the moment, we are not changing the Person class to "Internships", which is why our diagrams are all named Person. We are following the addressbook convention for all our uml diagrams and code base. Our documentation mirrors our code, so there is no error there.
In the future, we aim to adjust the naming of the code to better suit our product.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
InternHub is about managing applications, yet the Developer Guide (DG) still references the person class throughout the application.
This should be properly named as CS2103 recommends the naming of models to be related to what they are representing.
In fact, the User Guide has mentioned that what the user is adding is an
internship application
(as shown below). The InternHub DG and java files should have been refactored to update with this new context change.Rationale for a medium: I have given this a medium, as it makes it very difficult for incoming developers to continue working on this project with this mislabbeled model. It continued work on the project confusing for developers and the code base is hard to maintain as we have to constantly remind ourselves that
internship applications
is the equivalence of aperson
class.A few of the many examples: