Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Should also work direct after tags
%p&= content
Original comment by lanwin...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2008 at 11:07
This rule conflicts with !!! and so is a lo priority at this time. &= and
engine-wide
encoding have been implemented.
Original comment by andrew.j...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2008 at 11:31
I think we should change the markup rules to expose an char array instead of
only one
char. Rules with larger arrays have precedence over shorter arrays. So i the
engine
finds an ! i should change the second char. If non of them matches it should
use the
single ! and so forth.
Original comment by lanwin...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2008 at 11:49
change == check :-)
Original comment by lanwin...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2008 at 11:52
Yeah, we can do this. It's just a shame the Haml guys introduced this ambiguity
in
the language :-/
Original comment by andrew.j...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2008 at 10:09
Ok who dose it?
Original comment by lanwin...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2008 at 10:13
I will.
Original comment by andrew.j...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2008 at 10:37
Ok. Even if the syntax is not so nice :-) i think we should stay near by the
way haml
works.
Original comment by lanwin...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2008 at 10:41
add support for !=
Original comment by simon.cropp@gmail.com
on 21 Jun 2009 at 12:27
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
lanwin...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2008 at 10:58