JeffPaine
commented
9 years ago After more consideration, I think it best to simply to remove all zero padding from output file names. Either we
- Bite the performance bullet of reading the file twice (once to count lines, the other to split)
- Pick an arbitrary amount of zero padding
- Add a flag for amount of zero padding
None of these seem all that desirable right now.
Right now, we auto-append 001, 002, etc. to output filenames. It would be cool to have this zero padding reflect the number of files actually saved (e.g. 01.csv for < 99 files), but I would think that would require us to count (read into memory) all the lines of the file, first.