JeffersonLab / analyzer

HallA C++ Analyzer
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
7 stars 54 forks source link

Scons build fails at c++ compiler check. #97

Closed JureBericic closed 8 years ago

JureBericic commented 8 years ago

Cannot build the analyzer using the scons. It fails with:

    Got a 64-bit processor, I can do a 64-bit build in theory...
    64-bit Linux build
    Checking whether the C++ compiler works... no
    !!! Your compiler and/or environment is not correctly configured.

However, the build using make works fine.

brash99 commented 8 years ago

Hi Jure,

As the message says, there appears to be something about your C++ environment that is not configured the way that scons required (which admittedly is not very much). Can you send me (brash@jlab.org) the file config.log that is produced when you run scons?

Cheers, E.

Dr. Edward J. Brash

Professor of Physics - Christopher Newport University Staff Scientist - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Honorary Senior Research Fellow - University of Glasgow Office: 757-594-7451 Mobile: 757-753-2831 FAX: 757-594-7919

On Nov 3, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Jure Bericic notifications@github.com wrote:

Cannot build the analyzer using the scons. It fails with:

Got a 64-bit processor, I can do a 64-bit build in theory...
64-bit Linux build
Checking whether the C++ compiler works... no
!!! Your compiler and/or environment is not correctly configured.

However, the build using make works fine.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/JeffersonLab/analyzer/issues/97, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE1Pu9vbiBAurem4B9btUVEozL531g8Hks5q6jW8gaJpZM4Ko0PQ.

hansenjo commented 8 years ago

Confirmed on my desktop machine. Same message. I'm using RHEL 7 and scons 2.5.0 from EPEL. The scons package was last updated in August of this year. Earlier this year, scons builds worked just fine on my box. Nothing obvious in the compiler environment has changed since then.

brash99 commented 8 years ago

I’ll figure out what is going on.

On Nov 3, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Ole Hansen notifications@github.com wrote:

Confirmed on my desktop machine. Same message. I'm using RHEL 7 and scons 2.5.0 from EPEL. The scons package was last updated in August of this year. Earlier this year, scons builds worked just fine on my box. Nothing obvious in the compiler environment has changed since then.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/JeffersonLab/analyzer/issues/97#issuecomment-258254640, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE1Puxc8C5Wi3Ydrlhl73xCcyXBZ-i7Dks5q6jtOgaJpZM4Ko0PQ.

brash99 commented 8 years ago

Ole, can you tell me what compiler version your RHEL 7 system is using, and also could you post the config.log file that is created when you type scons?

I have tested with an EL6 system and scons2.5.0 and it works ok for me. I will create an EL7 virtual machine tonight and try to recreate the behavior. I tried initially to use ifarm1402 (which is Centos7.2) at jlab, but it looks like they don’t have ROOT available for it yet … argh!

Cheers, E.

On Nov 3, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Ole Hansen notifications@github.com wrote:

Confirmed on my desktop machine. Same message. I'm using RHEL 7 and scons 2.5.0 from EPEL. The scons package was last updated in August of this year. Earlier this year, scons builds worked just fine on my box. Nothing obvious in the compiler environment has changed since then.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/JeffersonLab/analyzer/issues/97#issuecomment-258254640, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE1Puxc8C5Wi3Ydrlhl73xCcyXBZ-i7Dks5q6jtOgaJpZM4Ko0PQ.

hansenjo commented 8 years ago

Hi Ed,

the compiler version:

$ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4)

and config.log:

$ cat config.log file /home/ole/Develop/analyzer/SConstruct,line 163: Configure(confdir = .sconf_temp) scons: Configure: Checking whether the C++ compiler works... scons: Configure: ".sconf_temp/conftest_0.cpp" is up to date. scons: Configure: The original builder output was: .sconf_temp/conftest_0.cpp <-
int main()
{
return 0;
}

c++ -o .sconf_temp/conftest_0.o -c -std=c++11 -O "-Wall -Woverloaded-virtual" -Wextra -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-deprecated-declarations -m64 -pthread -rdynamic -DNDEBUG -DLINUXVERS -DHAS_SSTREAM -I/home/ole/evio-4.4.6/Linux-x86_64/include -Isrc -Ihana_decode -I/usr/include/root .sconf_temp/conftest_0.cpp c++: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wall -Woverloaded-virtual’ scons: Configure: no

Ahh ... I think we're on to something here.

Thanks for looking into this.

Ole

brash99 commented 8 years ago

Interesting.

On ifarm1402, scons uses g++ rather than c++, but c++ and g++ are the same exact executable. Is this true on your RHEL7 system? What are the outputs of c++ —version and g++ —version?

Cheers, E.

On Nov 3, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Ole Hansen notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi Ed,

the compiler version:

$ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4)

and config.log:

$ cat config.log file /home/ole/Develop/analyzer/SConstruct,line 163: Configure(confdir = .sconf_temp) scons: Configure: Checking whether the C++ compiler works... scons: Configure: ".sconf_temp/conftest_0.cpp" is up to date. scons: Configure: The original builder output was: .sconf_temp/conftest_0.cpp <-
int main()
{
return 0;
}

c++ -o .sconf_temp/conftest_0.o -c -std=c++11 -O "-Wall -Woverloaded-virtual" -Wextra -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-deprecated-declarations -m64 -pthread -rdynamic -DNDEBUG -DLINUXVERS -DHAS_SSTREAM -I/home/ole/evio-4.4.6/Linux-x86_64/include -Isrc -Ihana_decode -I/usr/include/root .sconf_temp/conftest_0.cpp c++: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wall -Woverloaded-virtual’ scons: Configure: no

Ahh ... I think we're on to something here.

Thanks for looking into this.

Ole — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/JeffersonLab/analyzer/issues/97#issuecomment-258268779, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE1PuzBNixVDN1vn0FGi1sviNWQaWIhUks5q6kgMgaJpZM4Ko0PQ.

hansenjo commented 8 years ago

Closed by commit df29d2b569322c80f4ce2021c58af67a57a9ded6