Closed baltzell closed 8 months ago
Looks like these tables were requesting run 19101 from CCDB in a file from run 19102:
[ConstantsManager] ---> loading table for run = 19101
[DB] ---> open connection with : mysql://clas12reader@clasdb-farm.jlab.org/clas12
[DB] ---> database variation : default
[DB] ---> database run number : 19101
[DB] ---> database time stamp : Thu Mar 07 03:01:25 EST 2024
[DB] ---> database connection : success
***** >>> adding : FTCAL / table = /daq/tt/ftcal
***** >>> adding : FTHODO / table = /daq/tt/fthodo
***** >>> adding : FTTRK / table = /daq/tt/fttrk
***** >>> adding : LTCC / table = /daq/tt/ltcc
***** >>> adding : ECAL / table = /daq/tt/ec
***** >>> adding : FTOF / table = /daq/tt/ftof
***** >>> adding : HTCC / table = /daq/tt/htcc
***** >>> adding : DC / table = /daq/tt/dc
***** >>> adding : CTOF / table = /daq/tt/ctof
***** >>> adding : CND / table = /daq/tt/cnd
***** >>> adding : BST / table = /daq/tt/svt
***** >>> adding : RF / table = /daq/tt/rf
***** >>> adding : BMT / table = /daq/tt/bmt
***** >>> adding : FMT / table = /daq/tt/fmt
***** >>> adding : RICH / table = /daq/tt/rich2
***** >>> adding : HEL / table = /daq/tt/hel
***** >>> adding : BAND / table = /daq/tt/band
***** >>> adding : RTPC / table = /daq/tt/rtpc
***** >>> adding : RASTER / table = /daq/tt/raster
[DB] ---> database disconnect : success
Yep, the RUN::config HIPO bank really thinks there's multiple run numbers.
First (useful) event in the file:
run : 19102
event : 20379394
unixtime : 0
trigger : 1152
timestamp : 474915755268
type : 0
mode : 0
torus : -0.5000
solenoid : 0.5000
And a few thousand events later we get a single, odd, run 19101 event:
* NODE * group = 10000, item = 11, type = 11, size = 38
run : 19101
event : 20651841
unixtime : 1702373341
trigger : 384
timestamp : 544974522848
type : 0
mode : 0
torus : -0.5000
solenoid : 0.5000
Ah, it's a batch of 10 events, must be the event misordering that happened with wrong ET configuration during RG-D. Didn't know it could cross run numbers ...
closed by #215
From one of RG-D's workflows, looks like /cache/clas12/rg-d/data/clas_019102/clas_019102.evio.00278 gives this:
(One of the "19101/19101" is just a printout mistake in the code.)