Open bswck opened 4 months ago
The way both things work is obviously different, I'm very interested in exploring when which tool fits best Or whether they could be combined?
The main difference is that autotyping is a static tool (it just looks at the source code) and monkeytype is a dynamic tool (it requires you to run the code). That leads to different tradeoffs: autotyping is easier to set up because it doesn't require you to figure out a way to run code in production or similar to collect data; monkeytype is more powerful because it has actual runtime information instead of analyzing only the source code.
Place bets for the duel of the history, autotyping vs MonkeyType