Open Jellybeano opened 3 years ago
Thank you for the issue.
The command is not present in the current UG, but the DG also gives space for us to consider implementations for future iterations. So, not every feature or implementation discussed in the DG have to be part of the UG/product.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: The reasoning is very valid if the unsortp command actually had not been implemented, but the command was actually implemented and even gives a successful message after a user enters unsortp
Perhaps an oversight?
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.High
]
Reason for disagreement: same reasoning as above
The unsort command is not present in the User Guide, perhaps due to an oversight when implementing the command in the later stages of the project?
The above instruction in the DG also becomes invalid.