Homework 03 is ready for grading

[Jenncscampbell]

@peterwhitman @diermc

[peterwhitman]

Jennifer,

Your homework submission is impressive. It is well organized, detailed, and interesting. You more than adequately addressed each task with figures, tables, and descriptions. I really appreciated the commentary you provided throughout the assignment. It allowed me to follow your train of thought. I was also very impressed by your exploration and use of packages/functions that we haven't covered in class--you clearly put in some extra effort. The outline of your process that you provided in your README file provided a good summary of your approach and workflow for each task.

Well done! check plus

Peter

[derekcho]

Hi @Jenncscampbell ! Here are some comments about your hw03

• Very nice report organization, very visually appealing!! I like your explanations as well
• Nice plots, although I would be careful with your axis labels. “value” isn’t a very informative label
• You should remove the statement echo=FALSE in the future, things may not look as nice but it makes it a lot easier for the graders to evaluate your code without having to switch back and forth between the md and Rmd files
• Coloring the outliers on the boxplots was a nice touch!
• Your coding style is good and easy to read
• Repository is well organized and things are easy to find
• Nice work getting the tables formatted with knitr
• Four tasks completed, but none were novel or new
• Good work overall

Note: your mark (check minus, check, check plus) will be distributed later.

[diermc]

Hi Jennifer,

Pros -Nice layout -Great explanations of your tasks to fill out the story surrounding the questions -Code is solid and easy to follow -Your progress report is easy to follow and well organized by task -Great job doing 4/3 tasks -Interesting interpretation of task 2, very different from my own direction using geom_linerange(), but a boxplot does show the spread around the mean for each so it works. -A neat figure for task 4 showing the countries (next time you could colour your jitter data to match your graph colour scheme)

Cons -I like the idea of having a file with just figures and your text, but you should have a separate .md file with the code in as well to directly see the results from the code to make marking easier -Make sure your code chunks and comments don't get cut off throughout -Maybe spellcheck your work (there is the button at the top of R with the letters, or for your readme you can fire it into word quick to catch silly typos) -Try and name your image .png chunks (you do this by adding names after your figure) -Tweek tasks or take the assigned ones one step further to go above and beyond the assignment

Awesome job! Very clean cut.

Cheers, Sarah