feat: serialize AST node back to wikitext string

[linonetwo]

closes #8255

Currently just a demo, I will gradually move code from https://github.com/tiddly-gittly/wikiast/tree/master/packages/wikiast-util-to-wikitext to here.

Try it with tiddler (Well, if official website have share plugin installed, I can put a link here):

AAA test

---

\```js
var match = reEnd.exec(this.parser.source)
\```

end

and run this in console:

$tw.utils.serializeParseTree($tw.wiki.parseTiddler('New Tiddler').tree) 

[vercel[bot]]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
tiddlywiki5	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jun 12, 2024 5:39pm

[pmario]

The problem here is, that the output of you test does not produce the same rendered HTML output as the original source. See the screenshot.

[linonetwo]

First line is wrapped by a p element, but I haven't find the rule that produce the p element. And there was no p html in the source, so I may need to add some attribute to ast to show this p element is "fake".

Anyway, this is just a demo for API, do you like the API name and their usage? The further task is just adding exports.serailize = xxx to each rule.

[pmario]

First line is wrapped by a p element, but I haven't find the rule that produce the p element. And there was no p html in the source, so I may need to add some attribute to ast to show this p element is "fake".

IMO the current parser has a "systemic" problem with redundant P-tags, that we probably may need to solve first.

Working around this problem with "fake" elements will just increase your code complexity, instead of solving the underlaying problem. It will also create an other dependency, that will make solving the problem, in the core, in backwards compatible way even harder as it is now.

[linonetwo]

redundant P-tags

Can't remove then, many of my plugin style sheet is already depending on this structure. And p > text for block is following HTML5 semantic.

Another option is handle it like text node, regard it as a special case.

[pmario]

And p > text for block is following HTML5 semantic.

That's true, but we do have a lot of p > div which should not happen at all.