LLM usage is clearly documented and well noted in the llm directory.
Title:
The title is very informative of the overall story and represents the idea of the paper very well.
Author/s, date, and repo
The author, date, and repo are indicated in the YAML header.
Abstract
The abstract is also included in the YAML header and is appropriately pitched to a non-specialist audience. Moreover, the abstract answers the purpose, result, and importance of the paper elaboratively. Furthermore, a broader societal topic is discussed in the abstract as well.
Introduction
The introduction is elaborative enough that the reader clearly understands the motive, purpose, background, and result of the paper. Similarly to the abstract, the introduction answers the purpose, result, and importance of the paper to a great extent. However, it needs to be more concise to be a good introduction.
Estimand
Estimands were provided on 3 hypotheses of the paper. The first hypothesis suggests that when a situation involves risk and the outcome is negative, observers tend to view individuals who chose not to act more positively than those who took an action. The second hypothesis suggests that when there is no history of outcomes or if previous outcomes were positive, a protagonist who decides not to act is generally preferred over one who takes action. Moreover, in the last hypothesis, it is suggested that when previous outcomes have been negative, a protagonist who takes action is favored over one who does not act.
Data
All datasets are clearly displayed in table form and explained elaboratively. However, it is a bit too detailed, and I would suggest moving part of this section to the appendices.
Measurement
No clear section of measurement, but it is clearly demonstrated how data are manipulated in the Data section
Results
Graphs and tables are clearly explained and analyzed in the paper.
Discussion
A lot of discussion regarding weaknesses and strengths, the scope of the paper, and related social topics.
Cross-references
All figures and tables are properly labeled.
Prose
The prose is coherent and concise. Grammars are clear and errorless throughout the paper.
Graphs/Tables
Graphs and tables are all well labeled with captions, appropriately sized, and clear in understanding.
References
Everything is clearly referenced.
Commits
More than 2 commits and a meaningful commit message
Sketches
No sketches
Simulation
The simulation script is commented on and structured.
R citation:
R is properly cited and indicated in the paper.
Class paper:
There is no indication of a class paper.
LLM Usage:
LLM usage is clearly documented and well noted in the
llmdirectory.Title:
The title is very informative of the overall story and represents the idea of the paper very well.
Author/s, date, and repo
The author, date, and repo are indicated in the YAML header.
Abstract
The abstract is also included in the YAML header and is appropriately pitched to a non-specialist audience. Moreover, the abstract answers the purpose, result, and importance of the paper elaboratively. Furthermore, a broader societal topic is discussed in the abstract as well.
Introduction
The introduction is elaborative enough that the reader clearly understands the motive, purpose, background, and result of the paper. Similarly to the abstract, the introduction answers the purpose, result, and importance of the paper to a great extent. However, it needs to be more concise to be a good introduction.
Estimand
Estimands were provided on 3 hypotheses of the paper. The first hypothesis suggests that when a situation involves risk and the outcome is negative, observers tend to view individuals who chose not to act more positively than those who took an action. The second hypothesis suggests that when there is no history of outcomes or if previous outcomes were positive, a protagonist who decides not to act is generally preferred over one who takes action. Moreover, in the last hypothesis, it is suggested that when previous outcomes have been negative, a protagonist who takes action is favored over one who does not act.
Data
All datasets are clearly displayed in table form and explained elaboratively. However, it is a bit too detailed, and I would suggest moving part of this section to the appendices.
Measurement
No clear section of measurement, but it is clearly demonstrated how data are manipulated in the Data section
Results
Graphs and tables are clearly explained and analyzed in the paper.
Discussion
A lot of discussion regarding weaknesses and strengths, the scope of the paper, and related social topics.
Cross-references
All figures and tables are properly labeled.
Prose
The prose is coherent and concise. Grammars are clear and errorless throughout the paper.
Graphs/Tables
Graphs and tables are all well labeled with captions, appropriately sized, and clear in understanding.
References
Everything is clearly referenced.
Commits
More than 2 commits and a meaningful commit message
Sketches
No sketches
Simulation
The simulation script is commented on and structured.
Test
No test
Reproducibility
Clear Readme