Closed peterjc closed 10 years ago
If possible I would like to reinstate if (with the above ref). Variation is an important use case, and the fact that GVF is a formally a subset of GFF3 and that we have GFF3 to FALDO means we automatically have GVF to FALDO
Are there any papers we can cite for GTF, GFF, GFF3 etc -- or just the websites?
Currently we mention GVF once in the BioInterchange text (without definition in place, or in the abbreviations).
We could expand this, perhaps cite Reese et al. (2010) http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r88 and include GVF in the abbreviations?
In the short term I have simply removed the mention of GVF and just used GTF and GFF3 as example formats in the BioInterchange description.