search

JervenBolleman / FALDO-paper

Other
5 stars 5 forks source link

Position position #26

Open JervenBolleman opened 10 years ago

JervenBolleman commented 10 years ago

The predicate faldo:position with lower case can be confusing with the uppercase class faldo:Position. Should we change one of the labels? or should we point to the convention as used in e.g. DCAT.

JervenBolleman commented 9 years ago

We could do the following

faldo:position owl:deprecated true ;
                      rdfs:comment "This propery is deprecated but still in use. While typing Sparql queries or OWL axioms this might get confused with the class Position."
                      owl:equivalentProperty faldo:hasPosition .
faldo:hasPosition owl:equivalentProperty faldo:position .
cmungall commented 9 years ago

+1

On 18 May 2015, at 3:50, JervenBolleman wrote:

We could do the following

faldo:position owl:deprecated true ;
                   rdfs:comment "This propery is deprecated but still 
in use. While typing Sparql queries or OWL axioms this might get 
confused with the class Position."
                   owl:equivalentProperty faldo:positionOf .
faldo:positionOf owl:equivalentProperty faldo:position .

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/JervenBolleman/FALDO-paper/issues/26#issuecomment-103014610

mbrush commented 9 years ago

+1 here as well

nlwashington commented 8 years ago

based on https://github.com/JervenBolleman/FALDO/pull/23, does that mean this ticket is closed as wont-fix?

JervenBolleman commented 8 years ago

@nlwashington I think so. Although the paper seems to be in editorial limbo at the moment.