I have added a new test case for PathsService.uniqueName to showcase its intended behaviour. The signature of this property (which IMHO should have been a method) suggests that it would always return the same value, whereas it actually behaves in quite the opposite way.
Therefore, I believe that my new test case, primitive as it may be, is actually useful.
I have added a new test case for
PathsService.uniqueNameto showcase its intended behaviour. The signature of this property (which IMHO should have been a method) suggests that it would always return the same value, whereas it actually behaves in quite the opposite way.Therefore, I believe that my new test case, primitive as it may be, is actually useful.