Open nandu90 opened 4 weeks ago
A couple of comments and edits formatting wise but needs a content review.
Will close #25
TODO
@nandu90 Rupert mentioned the following to me referring to the formula @ https://github.com/JezSw/nekRS/blob/e2bd11a6334ab5d748bff27f3ca5f9e6b275ba57/doc/source/theory.rst?plain=1#L38. Could you check this makes sense?
I think viscosity (mu) is missing from the no-stress formulation: I think it should be nabla.tau = mu laplacian u - maybe check with someone though in case I'm just missing something.
Will close #25
Ready for review