WDSR-B:
x->6x->0.8x->x
computation:
6+6x0.8+3x3x0.8=18
act:
6
3x3Conv:
40%
(I think you use the second 1x1 Conv just to align the computation with one EDSR block and WDSR-A block)
WDSR-B-modified:
x/2->3x->x/2
computation:
3/2+3/2x3x3=15
act:
3
3x3Conv:
90%
So you can compare the performance: WDSR-A-B5 vs. WDSR-B-modified-B6.
WDSR-A x/2->2x->x/2 computation: 3x3x2/2+3x3x2/2=18 act: 2 3x3Conv: 100%
WDSR-B: x->6x->0.8x->x computation: 6+6x0.8+3x3x0.8=18 act: 6 3x3Conv: 40% (I think you use the second 1x1 Conv just to align the computation with one EDSR block and WDSR-A block)
WDSR-B-modified: x/2->3x->x/2 computation: 3/2+3/2x3x3=15 act: 3 3x3Conv: 90% So you can compare the performance: WDSR-A-B5 vs. WDSR-B-modified-B6.