Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Similar to issue 121, where the hyphen character was added.
http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/issues/detail?id=121
Original comment by t.denley
on 17 Feb 2011 at 9:13
I have the same problem, so i have done a patch to pass this.
Warning, the issue 121 isn't about the @ caracter.
Original comment by ybonnel
on 5 Apr 2011 at 6:40
Attachments:
Thanks for doing a patch. I think that allowing a bypass of field validation is
a bit overkill though. I'd suggest the following patch might be a bit more
targeted.
Original comment by t.denley
on 5 Apr 2011 at 10:20
Attachments:
Are there any committers reviewing bugs at the moment?
Given the simplicity of this fix, is there any chance of getting it into 1.7?
Original comment by t.denley
on 7 Apr 2011 at 6:21
Unfortunately, with certain browsers this would cause problems while doing
evals on JSON objects. That said, I'm not too worried about relaxing this
constraint on Gson since we should be aligning more closely with the JSON spec
rather than focusing on what certain clients can and cannot handle.
Original comment by joel.leitch@gmail.com
on 12 Apr 2011 at 4:42
I'm surprised that we do any name policy enforcement at all. JSON permits
anything in a name; we should too. If that means we can't map a property to a
field, then we have to fail at runtime.
Original comment by limpbizkit
on 12 Apr 2011 at 4:48
Fixed in r798.
Original comment by joel.leitch@gmail.com
on 12 Apr 2011 at 5:31
Thanks for the fix.
Are there instructions for doing a local snapshot build anywhere?
I was hoping to lift a suitable artefact from gson CI, but
http://continuousbuild.dyndns.org:8080/job/gson/ seems rather sad at the moment.
Original comment by t.denley
on 12 Apr 2011 at 7:13
We are planning to push a new version of Gson today. Can you wait another day
for the public release?
Original comment by joel.leitch@gmail.com
on 12 Apr 2011 at 9:36
Sure, no rush.
I was under the impression that this fix hadn't made it into 1.7 though. Am I
mistaken?
Original comment by t.denley
on 12 Apr 2011 at 10:09
The 1.7 push went out earlier today that contains this fix. Enjoy!
Original comment by joel.leitch@gmail.com
on 13 Apr 2011 at 7:16
Fantastic! Thanks.
Original comment by t.denley
on 13 Apr 2011 at 8:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
t.denley
on 17 Feb 2011 at 9:11