Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
all is explained here
http://code.google.com/p/maashaack/wiki/ConditionalCompilation
conditional compilation si for people dealing with the source code on a daily
basis
others will use SWC build
Original comment by zwetan
on 14 Sep 2009 at 10:57
It's not possible for me for the moment to use only swc with my projects. It a
too
big new feature and i must be sure in the future it's easy to creates swc with
the
last version of Maashaack and VEGAS ;)
In the unit tests is not a really problem to use this feature but in the
Maashaack
code source is not really good for the moment.
Original comment by ekamel...@gmail.com
on 14 Sep 2009 at 12:46
> It's not possible for me for the moment to use only swc with my projects
this is a false argument, SWC are just pre-compiled AS code
if we do regularly small dot release like 0.1.1, 0.1.2, 0.1.3, etc.
you will always have the last code update in the SWC
at worst you will have max 1 or 2 week delay from one SWC to another
Original comment by zwetan
on 14 Sep 2009 at 12:51
Hello :)
Yes but for the moment i don't see the new swc of Maashaack in the trunk or in
the
other branches of the project ;)
We must decide a type of process to develop with this implementation and i must
test
it with an external of the current swc in the source code of VEGAS, etc. I can't
handicap for the moment or in the next versions all my users.
For the moment i have a bug in all my projects with this feature and it's not
good
during my holidays ;)
Original comment by ekamel...@gmail.com
on 14 Sep 2009 at 12:58
the SWC will never go in the trunk, there will be in the download page
the build should be able to generate the SWC right now
it is not a bug, if you want to keep compiling from source you can edit your
compiler setting from what is
explained in the http://code.google.com/p/maashaack/wiki/ConditionalCompilation
page
the conditional compilation will not go away
Original comment by zwetan
on 14 Sep 2009 at 1:12
:(
Original comment by ekamel...@gmail.com
on 14 Sep 2009 at 1:23
Original comment by ekamel...@gmail.com
on 22 Sep 2011 at 6:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ekamel...@gmail.com
on 14 Sep 2009 at 3:04