[ ] I think we could think of our "feedback" stuff as varying whether the advice is a credence good or not (credence goods are things like vitamins or vaccines where we might not get much info, if any).
[ ] I think we should call out more in intro why explainability could affect performance / reliance on the algo
[x] Get all the green text / asides / TODOs out of the text
[ ] One idea = on paragraph. Make more liberal use of paragraph breaks.
[ ] Main findings bullet - good, but turn into paragraphs. For Section 2, I think it would be better to just describe Part I experiment w/o mentioning Part 2, and then maybe mention Part II later. Keeps it simpler for the reader.
[ ] We should give a more descriptive name to treatments. What I'd like to propose is something like:
TruthRevealedExPost = 1 or 0
and AlgorithmExplained = 1 or 0
"feedback" and "transparency" are just so general that as I was reading, I found myself forgetting which one was which
To make them stand out even more, you can do them in \textsc{} in LaTeX.
[x] Figure captions go on top of figures, not underneath. Notes go underneath.
[ ] We will not be able to rely on color to distinguish in printed draft so might as well start using linebreaks & whatnot now
[ ] For Figure 4, one nice thing to do would be to annotate plots---even by hand w/ arrows & labels to show what is happening
[ ] Figure 5 is cool but needs some work visually - try making it larger, using big.mark = "," for the columns, etc. Generally you want the most informative labels you can get
E.g., not just 1 but "Round 1"
and not "guess_r" but "Guess revised after algorithmic presentation, guess_r" if you can fit it
Assume your readers can't remember anything
[x] \cite to \citep
[ ] I think we could think of our "feedback" stuff as varying whether the advice is a credence good or not (credence goods are things like vitamins or vaccines where we might not get much info, if any).
[ ] I think we should call out more in intro why explainability could affect performance / reliance on the algo
[x] Get all the green text / asides / TODOs out of the text
[ ] One idea = on paragraph. Make more liberal use of paragraph breaks.
[ ] Main findings bullet - good, but turn into paragraphs. For Section 2, I think it would be better to just describe Part I experiment w/o mentioning Part 2, and then maybe mention Part II later. Keeps it simpler for the reader.
[ ] We should give a more descriptive name to treatments. What I'd like to propose is something like:
TruthRevealedExPost = 1 or 0
and AlgorithmExplained = 1 or 0
"feedback" and "transparency" are just so general that as I was reading, I found myself forgetting which one was which
To make them stand out even more, you can do them in \textsc{} in LaTeX.
[x] Figure captions go on top of figures, not underneath. Notes go underneath.
[ ] We will not be able to rely on color to distinguish in printed draft so might as well start using linebreaks & whatnot now
[ ] For Figure 4, one nice thing to do would be to annotate plots---even by hand w/ arrows & labels to show what is happening
[ ] Figure 5 is cool but needs some work visually - try making it larger, using big.mark = "," for the columns, etc. Generally you want the most informative labels you can get
E.g., not just 1 but "Round 1" and not "guess_r" but "Guess revised after algorithmic presentation, guess_r" if you can fit it Assume your readers can't remember anything